Steve Atkins wrote: >>> The cynic in me says that the sole purpose of SSP is to >>> affect the deployment of DKIM.
>> And the sole purpose of DKIM is to accelerate SpamCop's >> report generation... <gd&r> > Or at least make it more accurate. That is _one_ of the > goals of DKIM, and one it's likely to fulfill, I think. Yes, I can't tell if SC already uses DKIM for this purpose. > Similarly for feedback loops from some large ISPs. And with less complications. > Note, though, that I didn't say whether SSP would affect DKIM > deployment positively or negatively - I suspect views on that > would differ wildly. :) I'll wait until I see more drafts with an "approved" stamp. If DKIM boils down to "use crypto to protect your timestamp line", is it just another way to emulate reverse paths without using reverse paths ? Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
