[ietf-dkim] DKIM issues

Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:36:56 -0700

Here are the SSP issues as of today that I have.  If you have more, please send a note to this mailing list with the subject "New Issue".  This message is best viewed as HTML.  To view the issue tracker go to https://rt.psg.com and log in as ietf/ietf.  Then click on dkim on the right.

Eliot










1217 SSP: hould we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable? open dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6 months ago
6 months ago 0
1356 What is the purpose of SSP? new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 13 hours ago
13 hours ago 0
1357 SSP: Clarity among the usage scenarios new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 13 hours ago
13 hours ago 0
1358 ssp-requirements-01 // DKIM Strict definition needed. new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9 min ago
9 min ago 0
1359 ssp-requirements-01 // Outsource First Party Signing concerns extended new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7 min ago
7 min ago 0
1360 ssp-requirements-01 // Designated Signing Domain Scenario missing new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6 min ago
6 min ago 0
1361 ssp-requirements-01 // Negative Commentary corrections new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4 min ago
4 min ago 0
1362 SSP: Problems with Scenario 4: Resent new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 min ago
3 min ago 0
1363 SSP: Discover "requirement" new dkim Nobody 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 min ago
1 min ago 0
1364 Generic requirements for SSP, v1. new dkim Nobody 0 
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to