Damon wrote: [never send mail = nice to have] > Being an administrator, any time you give me more low > hanging fruit that I don't have to process, the more money > you save me. Because this translates into dollars/yen/rials > whatever :) I am all for this feature.
Okay, then let's keep this dubious MUST, and "hope" that all publishers and receivers know the difference between "spf2.0/pra -all", "v=spf1 -all", "SSP never send mail", and old drafts like Mark's nullmx. That reduces 1356 (IIRC) to typos, join 5.4 (1)+(3), and my question why another "nice to have" 5.4 (4) is a MUST. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
