I've been using Exodus for this IETF Jabber exercise. The first time you reported a problem several weeks ago, you indicated using a different server. I randomly selected one, borderlinenormal.com, created a login account, and have not had a problem joining the DKIM room.
--- HLS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Atkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ietf-dkim WG" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Jabber session this Thursday 1500 UTC > > On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > > > > > > Steve Atkins wrote: > >> Given that jabber appears to be not ready for > >> prime time, in oh so many ways, has anyone > >> considered using a more reliable technology? > > > > > > Sorry, Steve, but I do not know of any problems with Jabber/xmpp > > technology, and its overall track record for IETF use has been > > excellent. Further the range of free client software seems quite > > good. > > > > The problem we are having is operational, with a donated service. > > (And, by the way, it's rarely been a problem during IETF week, so > > this is not a case of reaching some sort of limit.) > > > > If you know of other problems, what are they? > > I keep seeing reports here of people being unable to > join the jabber chats. > > Previous attempts by other groups I've been involved > with to use jabber have had those too, along with > people being unable to create jabber accounts. > > (I've also not found a decent jabber client for OS X > that's stable and has the functionality I'd expect. > Suggestions welcome.) > > Cheers, > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
