Disclaimer: this is really the province of the chairs, but as an individual, here is my view:
Dave Crocker wrote: > > > Eliot Lear wrote: >> Many of the issues are awaiting confirmation from the chairs that I >> should close them. In some cases this is due simply to an apparent >> consensus on the jabber session that no change should be made, but that >> it would be confirmed on the mailing list. > > Eliot, > > Thanks for the follow-up and clarification. > > What items are in need of working group discussion? > Here is a summary from rt.psg.com and some Eliot commentary 1201: PROPOSED CLOSED && NO FURTHER DISCUSISON 1356: OPEN - no next action listed 1357: Mike to clarify text 1358: PROPOSE REJECT - consensus on jabber not to proceed 1359: PROPOSED CLOSED - long jabber log 1360: OPEN "heading toward close/reject" with discussion on the list 1361: CLOSE/ACCEPT/MOOT since the entire section involved is disappearing 1362: OPEN awaiting resolution of 1357 1363: ACCEPTED, Dave to Assist Mike with text. 1364: ACCEPT - Mike to confirm that this area is covered. Probably an email to the list is in order. 1365: OPEN (half of it, anyway) 1366: consensus to REJECT on the jabber. 1367: consensus to REJECT on the jabber. 1369: consensus to REJECT on jabber So, by my reading, 1357 and 1365 are open and not blocked, while others that are open are awaiting some action. Barring an action from the chairs I will close all those that are "PROPOSE REJECT" or "PROPOSE CLOSED" in the next day or so (they can always be reopened if the chairs find I've erred). Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
