I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting format
I disagree that it should be the only reporting format supported. What we want today and what we will want in five years time are going to be different. ARF is a decent start but its limited. To go much further it is going to be necessary to use structured data. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:44 PM > To: O'Reirdan, Michael > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a > reportingaddress(fwd) > > +1 > > I believe that I was the one that asked for the feedback > loop a long time ago. > I like the ARF format. > Not really concerned about it being abused. I have far worse > in the postmaster box just as it is. It is just another tool to help. > > Regards, > Damon Sauer > > On Nov 10, 2007 1:38 PM, O'Reirdan, Michael > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree. It would be a massive hassle for us to have to do > something else. > > > > Mike O'Reirdan > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Levine > > Sent: Sat 11/10/2007 12:23 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a > reporting > > address(fwd) > > > > > > > > >I gather that AOL has something where you (a sender) can > sign up to > > >receive an ARF feed of stuff you are sending that is > generating spam > > >reports. It's probably a good guess that this or > something close to > > >it is what the big guys are using to share information between > > >themselves. (Honestly, I don't know for sure if this is > what they do > > >use, but I assume so.) > > > > AOL, Hotmail, and Earthlink all have feedback loops that > return mail > > reported as spam in ARF format. Works great. (Nothing > secret about > > this, by the way.) > > > > Largely as an experiment, I've been sending all my spam > reports in ARF > > for the past year or so. Other than the occasional ISP who > still is > > afraid to open attachments, they've been accepted very well, even > > without any prearrangement with the recipients. > > > > If you're going to send back reports about messages, via SSP or > > otherwise, it'd be nuts to use any format other than ARF. > You might > > want to add another couple of items to the report info, but ARF is > > designed to be easily extensible. > > > > R's, > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
