Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting format > > I disagree that it should be the only reporting format supported. What we > want today and what we will want in five years time are going to be > different. ARF is a decent start but its limited. To go much further it is > going to be necessary to use structured data. >
Ok, but let's proceed cautiously here, Phillip. This is an area where more standards != better. How would you propose we manage interoperability? Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
