Jim Fenton wrote:
In the absence of a valid DKIM signature on behalf of the "From" address
[RFC2822], the verifier of a message MUST determine whether messages from a
particular sender are expected to be signed, and what signatures are
acceptable.
What's proving interesting is how completely the implication of this seems to
have been missed by quite a few participants.
I'l continue to repeat that I haven't found the working group discussion of
this implication.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
