On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:30:27 -0800 Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Jim Fenton wrote: >> In the absence of a valid DKIM signature on behalf of the "From" address >> [RFC2822], the verifier of a message MUST determine whether messages from a >> particular sender are expected to be signed, and what signatures are >> acceptable. > >What's proving interesting is how completely the implication of this seems to >have been missed by quite a few participants. > I seem to have missed the discussion where anyone but you is suprised by this. If one is going to distinguish between originator signatures and others, then this requirement pretty obviously follows.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
