On Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:09, Dave Crocker wrote: > Folks, > > If non-participants are to be asked about the potential use of SSP, it > helps to have a description of it that is concise, complete and for which > there is reasonable consensus about the content. Simply handing > non-participants a point to the specification is useless for all but the > most technical and dedicated. > Since you've already stated you think SSP is useless, please don't muddy the waters with writing more stuff for us to review that serves no purpose other than disctraction.
Let's focus on getting the spec done and sweat the marketing later. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
