How about changing it to something descriptive like "not SSP validated"? That's what it is, after all.We're much better off describing what the software does rather than implying what we the recipient might think about it.
I think that's fine. This issue isn't a show-stopper in my opinion. Arvel _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
