Dave Crocker wrote: > > You think it is argumentative that, for example, a protocol element > that directs a recipient to Reject mail will typically be adhered > to and that conforming to SSP but not adhering to that explicit > request is unlikely?
This seems to be a discussion of issue 1513 [1], in fact raised by Mike, and where the two of you may in fact agree (while doing a great job of appearing to disagree:-) Stephen. [1] https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1513 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
