> On Thursday 06 December 2007 12:17, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > ... but this working group has people who are prepared to spend > > a lot of time to shout down those they disagree with, leading to an > > unproductive and unprofessional environment. I find the lack of > > courtesy and professionalism here unpleasant enough that I tend > > not to get involved much, even though I see very poor design > > decisions being made. > > I'm sympathetic to this perspective. I think we have two > broad groups here. > One believes that SSP has utility and one believes that it > doesn't. Trying > to produce a design by committee that attempts to split the > difference is > suboptimal. > > Personally, I'm getting sick of the attacks on the concept > and utility of SSP > at this point in the game. I really wish people would focus > on making it as > good as it can be and then we'll see what we end up with.
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
