On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:12:05 -0800 Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Dec 6, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: > >> Steve Atkins wrote: >> >>> part of the push to try and build a next generation SPF >> >> No push in that direction on any SPF or IETF list I know, >> in fact discussing 2822 originator header fields on SPF >> lists would be on the border to "off topic" (excl. PRA >> for various and known reasons). >> >> A "part of the push" sounds like more than one or two >> contributors, are you talking about Doug's TBR draft ? >> That's IMO no SPF-TNG, it might be a kind of SMTP-TNG. > >I was referring to SSP, which is trying to be the next SPF >(and, in strict mode, is identical in functionality to a subset of >SPF). > What subset of SPF is that? I'm intimately familiar with SPF and I'm not following you.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
