On Friday 07 December 2007 13:23, Steve Atkins wrote: > You'd need to be more specific. As you state it, my answer is that > you're clearly and obviously wrong. > > If you were to be more specific in your wording (and the specificity > went > in the direction I'd expect) there's a chance I'd agree with you, but > at the > moment what you're saying is so broad and vague that it's clearly wrong. > Personally, I'd invest more time and effort in careful wording if I weren't convinced this is all just playing gotcha and were in fact a serious discussion.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
