> you or Dave are operating from for that not be true. From the looks > of it, that set of axioms leads to "SSP == bad", so I again wonder > why you're wasting your time, unless it is to prevent SSP from being > published.
An SSP that publishes actual things that a sender actually does, is non-controversial. For example: this domain signs all the mail it emits that has its domain on the From: line, or that domain emits no mail at all with its domain on the From: line. It's the mountain of add-on semantic baggage that's a problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
