Dave,
>
>      The underlying problem is with coupling the From field to the
> DKIM signature.  At most, the Sender value should be used.


It would indeed be nice to use the Sender field, but I would be
concerned about the Sender field not at least matching one of the
domains of one of the RFC2822.From lines, lest someone attempt to bypass
the tests by inserting a Sender.  But then we need an extra rule in the
state machine.  Perhaps it is better to explicitly deprecate multiple
>From lines?  As UIs have developed they really don't index well against
multiple From lines anyway.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to