On Monday 10 December 2007 09:57, Eliot Lear wrote: > Dave, > > > The underlying problem is with coupling the From field to the > > DKIM signature. At most, the Sender value should be used. > > It would indeed be nice to use the Sender field, but I would be > concerned about the Sender field not at least matching one of the > domains of one of the RFC2822.From lines, lest someone attempt to bypass > the tests by inserting a Sender. But then we need an extra rule in the > state machine. Perhaps it is better to explicitly deprecate multiple > From lines? As UIs have developed they really don't index well against > multiple From lines anyway. > We went through all this at the time the decision to use first From was made. No new information has been provided to warrant reconsideration. I'd suggest just mark the issue a duplicate and move on.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
