Michael Thomas wrote: > Part of the problem is that "softfail" and "hardfail" don't make > much intuitive sense.
For SPF (and Sender ID) a SOFTFAIL is what SSP has as t-flag, and an Authentication-Results: hardfail is just a FAIL (for SPF etc.). For receivers accepting "hardfail", not exactly the ideal course, but receivers are free to shoot into their own foot. Aim higher. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
