Siegel, Ellen wrote: > In other words, it is not affected by where the signing is done, but > rather by what entity is represented by the signature, i.e. the > originator could sign with a 3rd party signature, and an intermediary > could sign with a (delegated) 1st party signature.
Although a logical choice at the time it came into use, indeed the term "third-party" can be confusing. An example of a "third-party" signature is the originating operator. So it is fully at an end-point, but still qualifies. In other words, you are highlighting an key point. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
