Frank Ellermann:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> > "third-party" can be confusing.
> 
> Later in the draft and after posting the issue I saw
> "non-author".  That's also fine, but the interesting
> case isn't an "originating operator" (that is still
> end-to-end), but signatures by mediators.

And how would receivers tell the difference between these scenarios?

My position is don't assign different semantics to scenarios that
are indistinguishable to receivers.

        Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to