Mumble.
Proposed new text:
<t hangText="Note:"> By virtue of showing a single private/public
key pairing, <xref target="DKIMSvc" /> can be taken to refer
to a single message signature. The figure is not intended to
comment upon single vs. multiple signature and merely shows
the sequential relationship between a signer and a validator
and their functional components. </t>
d/
John Levine wrote:
> At the end of section 5, just before the header 5.1 (page 15 of the txt
> version) it says:
>
> Note: Figure 1 does not show the effects on the message handling
> when multiple signatures or non-author signatures are present.
>
> By my reading, fig 1 covers all signatures, single, multiple, author,
> or otherwise, e.g., in the figure it says Verify Signatures with
> Signatures in the plural.
>
> Suggested fix: delete the note.
>
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
