Jim, Jim Fenton wrote: > I don't think that the interpretation of multiple valid signatures is > beyond the scope of this document. The overview was created in order to > provide information on how DKIM might be used; ignoring the multiple > signature case does not serve that purpose well.
For the draft text I circulated in a message postd Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:39:17 -0700, what changes are you suggesting. (Or elsewhere in the document?) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
