Dave Crocker wrote: > One should not say "published" for a draft, but if one were to say it, > in fact an ADSP draft is indeed published. > > But it has not been declared a working group document.
I'm missing the distinction between "published" and "posted" (the latter being the one you'd probably prefer) in this context, but sure. Then allow me to rephrase: When the working group publishes something that replaces "ASP" with "ADSP", I'll update my drafts accordingly. > That's almost three nits, and I only started out intending one. > > No need to thank me. You guys are awesome. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
