On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Douglas Otis wrote: >>
>>> While such a scheme might be seen as Sender friendly if adopted, >>> this would doom DKIM. Selectors devoid of the publishing domain >>> offers no value. To suggest otherwise would be in support of a >>> false premise. > > Indeed. But I haven't done that. My apologies. The broken link to ARF limited better review. The ARF draft has been updated since as well, where recollection of what was included proved incorrect. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
