[ not about ADSP, about DKIM ] An acquaintance points out that one could prepend an extra From: or Subject: header to a DKIM signed message, which wouldn't break the signature, but would often be displayed by MUAs which show the new one rather than the old one. Needless to say, that weakens the practical benefit of DKIM for people with MUAs like that.
My theory is that DKIM only applies to valid 2822 messages, and it's not a substitute for a sanity check for all the screwy things one can send in a non-conformant message. Perhaps it would be a good idea someday to collect experience and advice into an implmentation guide, but other than that, it's not our problem. Agreed? Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
