On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:12:44 +0100, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is an implementation note about signing all end-user visible > header fields. The topic of multiple From headers came up during a > discussion about a DK implementation. It was suggested not to sign > such messages. If I recall correctly, the test was also done in the > DKIM implementation.
Yes, but scammers who sign their messages to enhance their plausibility are now going to follow such "suggestions" nor to sign with such implementations. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
