[Is this really appropriate for ietf-dkim?] On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Dotzero wrote: > I appreciate your concerns Murray because there is currently a limited > universe of folks I would personally consider (FWIW) consultant caliber. > On the other hand I'm somewhat a believer in Caveat Emptor. Given that > there is a demand out there, if not dkim.org then where will (should) > people turn? google search?
It of course also brings up the question of reputation. If we end up listing a bunch of consultants whose work leaves something to be desired, dkim.org won't be considered a good source of such information... Talk about eating our own dog food! _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
