On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave CROCKER wrote: > These are independently managed lists. Merging is possible, of course, > but we should get some pretty strong consensus to do that, I think.
They remain ambiguous if not. But anyway, there's my vote in the hopes of creating some consensus. :) >> I'd say this is the general list for questions about deployment and >> operations. This is where I believe questions about reputation and >> multiple signatures should be discussed, except where those coversations >> relate directly to standardization or development/testing. > > Ewww. "reputation"? No, I hope not. For the moment, we are only > talking about the mechanics of creating and interpreting DKIM > signatures. I'm referring mainly to general public questions about "How do I tie this to reputation?" Not our industry debates; those go on MAAWG or IETF lists as they have been. > Anyhow, is the ops list where the water-cooler self-help consulting > should take place? That's what I believe, yes. >> Are there other potential discussions that wouldn't be covered by these >> which warrant having their own venues? > > That's my question, yes. I can't think of any. If such did appear, separate venues could be created. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
