Well, it is explicitly out of scope for the working group, and if discussion on VBR is conducted here it might tend to confuse people into thinking that we don't understand that.
ASRG lists, perhaps? -Jim Dave CROCKER wrote: > The draft doesn't specify a discussion venue. I believe the plan is to > request > Informational RFC status. > > With respect to the IETF, is there a better place for discussion than the > DKIM list? > > d/ > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt > Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:45:01 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : Vouch By Reference > Author(s) : P. Hoffman, et al. > Filename : draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2008-10-09 > > This document describes the Vouch By Reference (VBR) protocol. VBR > is a protocol for adding third-party certification to email. It > permits independent third parties to certify the owner of a domain > name that is associated with received mail. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
