Jim Fenton wrote: > Well, it is explicitly out of scope for the working group, and if
Jim, the wg is winding down. I believe the only pending work is the Deployment document. It is common to have wg mailing lists persist beyond the life and scope of the wg charter, to discuss work done by the wg, of course, but also for discussing related activities. > ASRG lists, perhaps? That's a research group. This is about a specification intending standardization. We've just seen that an RG list isn't a very good venue for standards discussions. Were the DKIM wg in the midst of active development, no I would not suggest it as a venue for reviewing VBR. Given the relatively quiescent state of the list, I don't think we need to worry that much about scope or focus confusion. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
