I support this, as well as the wording that emphasizes d='s role. I particularly like the analogy here .. where it puts forward a concept I have of d= being the sum(i= 1-n) from an authority and reputation perspective.
-------- This document was initially formulated by an ad hoc design team, comprising: Jon Callas, J D Falk, Jim Fenton, Tony Hansen, Murray Kucherawy, John Levine, Michael Hammer, Jeff Macdonald, Ellen Siegel, Wietse Venema. It represents a rough consensus of that effort, although the final wording of the submitted draft is the sole responsibility (d=) of the listed author. -------- On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > I've just submitted an Internet Draft with text for the working group to > consider. A group of us have been working on it. > > It clarifies and resolves the roles and relationship of the d= and i= tag. > > An html version of the I-D is at: > > <http://dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-00.html> _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
