Stephen Farrell wrote: > Separately, is the best route from here to do a 4871bis > (assuming the 5378 mess gets sorted), that incorporates > all agreed errata to date? If not, then what?
Stephen, The intent for this effort was to issue it as an Errata entry, per <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php>. The changes are narrow and few. We really don't need to generate a brand new RFC just for this. Or at least, not yet, IMO. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
