Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> If you want a signature that identifies the individual user, there's
>> S/MIME and PGP.
>
> Instead of i=? In situations described where "author of the message"
> = "user" = "grandma"?
An ISP signs "on behalf of" the owner of a mailing list. While many different
d=/i= values could satisfy this, let's say that this particular operator
chooses
something like:
d= paying-users.this-isp.example
i= [email protected].
The From: field, of course, is something like:
From: [email protected].
So, how is a receiving assessment module supposed to know whether your scheme
is
in force or the one I've described here, or the one John uses, or the one...?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
