On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > John R. Levine wrote: >> Gee, how many ways are there to say that i= doesn't identify the user? >> The i= field doesn't do that. DKIM doesn't identify individuals, only >> domains. > > John, > Oh boy. > Your statement is not correct. > The spec says that it *does* identify a user.
Now that I have john levine and dave crocker in disagreement on just what i= does .. : >> Then we desperately need to rewrite whatever part of 4871 leads anyone to >> that erroneous conclusion. Right, thanks, John. --suresh _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
