On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:37 -0800 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Eliot Lear wrote: >> You've seen several votes for the alternate, but in any case Jim has >> offered alternate language, which i am inclined to accept. I would be >> happy to proceed, however, with a poll on the process, if you would like. > > >1. Jim sent the only posting that I read as simple, direct support. > >2. My request was for +1/-1 postings on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-02, not a >request for a multi-stage sequence starting with meta-questions about process. >
Don't wg chairs start LC? Also I sent a +1 to this list for Elliot's proposal, so your accounting is incomplete. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
