(d). My suggested changes to Eliot's proposal are at http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011153.html
-Jim Stephen Farrell wrote: > Hi All, > > We've had some recent discussion about d=/i= on the list > and a couple of concrete proposals for clarifications to > make to RFC 4871. > - The first is Dave's erratum I-D. [1] > - The second is a proposal from Eliot.[2] > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
