On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Wietse Venema <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen Farrell: >> (a) The erratum I-D [1] is ready to go. Process it. > > Motivation: > Adding tweaks to a confusing document does not remove the confusion > (you can consider this my variant of Brooks's law). > Confusion is removed by stating clear terms up-front, and by casting > the discussion into those terms.
+1 for a. The confusion is minimized by Dave's draft. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
