On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> If your sole goal in ADSP is "declare that domain x signs all mail" >> then there could be a far simpler and more cut down version of ADSP >> that'd fit the bill. To wit - the "locked ADSP record" part. > > I don't understand what this means.
I was looking at an older draft-otis, Sorry. The adsp draft on dkim.org calls this "bulk mailing domains with discardable mail" That's a special case. And I think that's the one case Mike Hammer is concerned about, rather than the rest of it. It would be a valid concern / need for me too - but I dont see how or why the rest of ADSP has to be supported solely for that one bit of quite useful functionality. -srs _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
