> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:23 PM > To: ietf-dkim WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call > > If you have a list of domains to check, you don't need any of the > ADSP infrastructure, just require valid DKIM signatures for any > mail coming from those domains on the list. > > So any use case that uses a list (private or public) of domains > to apply the algorithm to is probably out of scope for ADSP. >
And this is the reason I like to say that ADSP is the public mechanism for achieving what is currently being performed through private agreements. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
