>I'm not sure what my opinion is on that last point, but on the first >point I think it's best to define an identifier that's specifically >for ADSP's use, if we want that function. Some signers may give that >tag the same value they give i=, and there's no harm done. Some >signers may use a different value, which would demonstrate the wisdom >of separating them.
Seems like a reasonable way to avoid the i= fight. If there's interest, I can whip up a new ADSP draft with an r= tag. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
