Dave CROCKER wrote: > > Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed? >
I believe the Chairs requested that the other, non-controversial, errata be incorporated into this draft. Is that (editorial) work ongoing? -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
