Folks, Two days later. Still haven't seen any other issues raised with the draft.
d/ Dave CROCKER wrote: > Folks, > Question to the working group... > DKIM Chair wrote: >> To those who voted against draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata: given, now, that >> we >> will be using draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata to move forward, and the other >> choices are off the table, can you accept draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata as >> written? If not, will you post specific changes, in OLD/NEW format, that >> would >> make it acceptable to you? > > > Unless I've missed or misread other postings, the only item lodged, so far, > has > been Jim Fenton's suggest that the UAID acronym be replaced, and discussion > about that is proceeding. > > Are there other changes to draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata being proposed? > > d/ > > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
