On Mar 20, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > > Pasi's point is that what you're quoting is from the DKIM working > group only, and, at that, only from some 20 participants or so. > There are a lot more people who participate in the IETF, and the > normal process of review by the IESG and IETF last call provides the > opportunity for many more people to review and comment on the > document.
The concern seemed more related to making definitional changes to an an RFC within an errata. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
