>> well, now I'm completely confused. to my eyes, your example fits >> exactly what 'registered' and 'resolvable' mean, but I guess you >> have something else in mind.
Steve is quite right. Since the DKIM key records are at different names from the related MX or A record, the existence of one doesn't require or imply the existence of the other. I don't want to hold up this errata/update/whatever any more than it already is, so I'd suggest taking out any wording about the DNS status of the SDID. One of us should send in a separate technical erratum saying that DKIM key records SHOULD be published only for SDID domains that have corresponding MX or A records and can receive mail. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
