On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > We could say "DNS-resolvable".
We could, but it's not actually a requirement that the SDID resolve in the DNS (and in many cases it won't). I think "domain name" is just vague enough to avoid these problems. If you try and make it more specific without making it misleading, it's going to take more than just a couple of words to describe accurately. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
