Hector Santos wrote: > > I think these are addressed with an ADSP "valid signer domains" tag.
I'm sorry, Hector, I really don't see the relationship between the choice d= and i= values as having anything to do with the "designated signing domains" (I think it was called) proposal. > > The only reason I recall for ditching this "list" idea in SSP was the > concern it can become large. That was one reason, but there was working group consensus not to pursue that idea and I'm fairly sure it's not the Chairs' intent to reopen other issues that already have been decided by rough consensus. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
