Jim Fenton wrote: > Hector Santos wrote: >> I think these are addressed with an ADSP "valid signer domains" tag. > > I'm sorry, Hector, I really don't see the relationship between the > choice d= and i= values as having anything to do with the "designated > signing domains" (I think it was called) proposal. > >> The only reason I recall for ditching this "list" idea in SSP was the >> concern it can become large. > > That was one reason, but there was working group consensus not to pursue > that idea and I'm fairly sure it's not the Chairs' intent to reopen > other issues that already have been decided by rough consensus.
Thanks Jim. I appreciate the feedback. -- Sincerely Hector Santos http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
