>>> Informative Note: ADSP is incompatible with DKIM signing by parent >>> domains described in section 3.8 of [RFC4871] in which a signer uses >>> "i=" to assert that a parent domain is signing for a subdomain. >> >> That's not fine, since we've just gone around and agreed that the >> signing identity is d=. leave this paragraph out. > > I'm not sure what you think we have agreed, but the current (-09) ADSP > specification has an informative note pointing out incompatibility of > that version of ADSP with "valid DKIM usage" that isn't explicitly > mentioned in RFC 4871.
Right, I wrote that note to point out fundamental breakage in the -09 version of ADSP. > Since RFC 4871 does, explicitly, mention this > mode of usage of DKIM we really do need this informative note. This strikes me as gratuitously confusing, but I don't care enough to argue about it. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
