> The current proposal is to remove i= here, and rework the text so that ADSP > uses d= only.
The chairs note that this proposal has rough consensus. Jim has suggested that if we do this, and in view of the discussion of "Author" vs "Author Domain", we should make sure the documents consistently refers to "Author Domain Signature". We think that's a good idea, and we don't guess there'll be much objection to it. The discussion has not settled on the exact text, so the chairs ask the co-editors of the ADSP spec to settle on that, and post another draft. We'll have a quick WG review of that before passing it back to Pasi. Barry -- Barry Leiba, DKIM working group chair ([email protected]) http://internetmessagingtechnology.org/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
